How to cite Provael
Copy the BibTeX below: it cites release 0.46.0. The numbers on /results and /leaderboard were measured with provael 0.41.2, so when you quote one, name that version as well. Every version involved is listed further down.
BibTeX
@software{jain_provael_2026,
author = {Jain, Sattyam},
title = {Provael: red-teaming Vision-Language-Action robot policies in simulation},
version = {0.46.0},
year = {2026},
url = {https://github.com/provael/provael},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.21984184},
license = {Apache-2.0}
}Rendered from the same fields as CITATION.cff, so the two cannot drift into different versions. Released 2026-10-21.
DOI
A concept DOI: it resolves to the newest archived release (checked 4 October 2026). Releases before v0.34.0 are not archived, so they cannot be cited this way.
The version you cite is not the version that produced the numbers
They differ today, and they will differ again after any release that ships before the evidence manifest is re-pinned. Quoting the newest release beside figures measured at an older commit is fine, as long as you say which is which. Every release and what changed in it is on the changelog.
- Cite this release
- 0.46.0, released
- Numbers on /results and /leaderboard were measured with
- provael 0.41.2, run of 14 September 2026 (
results/smolvla_libero_object_suite_2026-09-14) - The evidence manifest carrying them is pinned at
- v0.46.0, commit
29405ab— the assembly, not the measurement - Evidence manifest last reviewed against the product artifact
Every public figure on this site derives from that pinned manifest at build time. See the measured result, the leaderboard and verification.
CITATION.cff
GitHub turns this file into the “Cite this repository” button on the repository page.
CITATION.cff on GitHubraw file (Citation File Format)
Citing the Embodied AI Security Top 10 separately
The Embodied AI Security Top 10, version 0.2 (2026), docs/top10.md. Licensed CC-BY-SA-4.0, not Apache-2.0 like the software. Its categories change through the open RFC, one version at a time, so cite the version you read.
It is a community-draft taxonomy with expert-elicited ranking, and is not affiliated with or endorsed by the OWASP Foundation or MITRE.